Skip to content

Ball Valve Engineer Guide

Use this section when reading ball valve results. Ball valve output is evidence-gated and nested. A technically interesting row is not automatically actionable.

  1. Check top-level status before reading rows.
  2. Check candidate_evaluation_status.
  3. Confirm the reference is attached and confirmed.
  4. Read match_result.results as flat row evidence.
  5. Read summary.grouped_output_contract and PipelineResult.presentation for grouped display.
  6. For each row, check class, technical_fit_class, original_public_class, and display_label.
  7. Check procurement_release_allowed, procurement_blockers, public_recommendation_allowed, and qualified_alternate.
  8. Read field_proofs, evidence_contract, core_gate_report, service_overlay_report, and modification_report.
  9. Follow recommended_next_action.
  • Do treat DROP_IN with procurement_release_allowed=true and no blockers as the only procurement-ready result.
  • Do treat FIT_OR_BETTER as still evidence/procurement-gated.
  • Do treat PROBABLE_DROP_IN as advisory and not procurement-ready.
  • Do treat REQUIRES_MODIFICATION as requiring named modification, approval, and verification.
  • Do use grouped presentation to explain manufacturer/brand grouping.
  • Do keep flat rows and grouped rows conceptually separate.
  • Do explain blockers directly.
  • Do ask for datasheet/nameplate/OEM orderable code when reference is weak or ambiguous.
  • Do not flatten ball valve output into a simple class list.
  • Do not call discovery rows replacement candidates.
  • Do not call PROBABLE_DROP_IN procurement-ready.
  • Do not recommend modification without approval/MOC/verification routing.
  • Do not treat AMBIGUOUS_MATCHES, INPUT_RECHECK_REQUIRED, or NO_REFERENCE as actionable.
  • Do not ignore candidate_evaluation_status.
  • Do not hide procurement blockers behind a positive technical class.
  • Do not call a reject proven unless the hard boundary is actually proven.
StatusEngineer action
OKRead row class, evidence contract, blockers, and procurement release flags.
AMBIGUOUS_MATCHESTreat rows as confirmation/discovery only; ask for exact OEM orderable code, datasheet, nameplate, or decisive specs.
INPUT_RECHECK_REQUIREDResolve conflicting or weak input before evaluating candidates.
NO_REFERENCERequest reference evidence; do not evaluate replacements.
ERRORTreat as no technical result; retry or escalate.
ClassWhat to do next
DROP_INConfirm procurement_release_allowed=true, no blockers, and closed evidence before recommending.
FIT_OR_BETTERCheck evidence and procurement gates; explain upgrade/specialization path.
PROBABLE_DROP_INRequest missing proof; do not release for procurement.
REQUIRES_MODIFICATIONConfirm named modification path, approval, verification, and MOC requirements.
POSSIBLE_MODIFICATION_PATHTreat as discovery; collect modification evidence.
ENGINEERING_CONFIRMATION_REQUIREDRoute to engineering with missing evidence/blockers.
PROBABLE_TECHNICAL_MATCHUse for discovery only; confirm reference and decisive specs.
REJECTConfirm hard boundary evidence before presenting as final rejection.
FieldWhat to do next
candidate_evaluation_status = DISCOVERY_ONLYUse rows only to clarify identity or direction.
candidate_evaluation_status = NOT_EVALUATEDDo not treat rows as evaluated replacements.
procurement_release_allowed=falseDo not recommend for procurement.
procurement_blockers not emptyExplain each blocker and collect required evidence.
evidence_contract open or failedClose decisive field proof before recommending.
field_proofs missing decisive proofRequest datasheet/nameplate/OEM source for that field.
modification_report incompleteDo not recommend modification route yet.
recommended_next_action presentUse it as the next human step.
  1. Start with top-level status and summary.
  2. Use summary.grouped_output_contract to understand whether public replacement counts are allowed.
  3. Use PipelineResult.presentation for grouped display by manufacturer and brand.
  4. Drill into flat results[] rows for evidence and blockers.
  5. Never let grouped placement imply procurement readiness.

When a row is PROBABLE_DROP_IN but procurement_release_allowed=false:

  1. State that the row is a likely technical direction, not a release candidate.
  2. Read procurement_blockers.
  3. Identify which field_proofs are missing or non-decisive.
  4. Ask for OEM datasheet, nameplate, rating, end connection, size, or service evidence.
  5. Re-evaluate only after evidence is closed.
  • Never claim “drop-in ball valve” from nominal size and end connection alone.
  • Never claim procurement readiness without procurement_release_allowed=true.
  • Never claim modification is acceptable without named approval and verification route.
  • Never claim discovery results are evaluated alternates.